|
ARTICLES
EXECUTIVE
DIRECTOR’S MESSAGE
By Gregory J. Carlson, ADVANCED RAM, HCCP, RCM,
nyarm
When
Will We Learn?
On
Thursday, August 14 New York City experienced a blackout of
major proportions, part of an event that affected eight states
and part of Canada as well. The Cooperative Coalition to Prevent
Blackouts (Coalition), and the Federation of New York Housing
Cooperatives and Condominiums (Federation) being one of the
founding members, has been warning the various state and federal
agencies for years that an event such as this was bound to
happen. To unravel the mystery of why and who is to blame
is under investigation, but it appears a single mishap paralyzed
the Northeast, plunging more than 50 million people into darkness
and costing billions of dollars in lost business and spoiled
provisions.
Founded on the premise and since its inception, the Coalition
has been trying to educate the powers that control electrical
power in New York State, the Independent Systems Operator
(ISO), Public Service Commission (PSC) and the New York State
Energy Research and Development Agency (NYSERDA), that conservation
and electrical behavior modification is the only course to
prevent occurrences like August 14.
The Coalition has attempted to hammer
down the various barriers erected to prevent consumer conservation.
It is a well-established fact that the submetering of electricity
can conserve electricity. In a cooperative, under current
PSC rules, shareholder approval is required to install individual
unit meters. I have been to many informational shareholder
meetings that are corrupted by a few loud, uninformed shareholders
who overtake the meeting and force the board to withdraw the
proposal. If you remove the politics and let a duly elected,
educated board decide the community’s fate, nine out
of ten times they’ll go with the submetering proposal,
because it makes sense.
Unlike other utilities the consumer
is unaware of how much they spend on electricity and how the
charges are calculated. Phone calls are charged by the minute,
water by gallons, gas and oil is measured by consumption.
Electricity is charged after the fact. To be able to read
an electric bill, you need a math degree! To understands the
tariffs, which are the definitive charges on your electric
bill, you need to be a rocket scientist! The Coalition predicts,
if the consumer understands how they are billed, they will
act accordingly and conserve. To achieve this state of conservation,
consumers need to be educated and billed with “Real
Time Pricing (RTP).”
In simple terms, RTP means the consumer
pays different electrical costs at certain times. When electricity
demand is low, at night, early in the morning and on weekends,
the consumer’s rates are lower. When demand is high,
during rush hour and weekdays, electric costs are higher.
As with other utility usage, once the consumer is educated
and understands RTP will save them money, they will adjust
their electrical behavior accordingly.
Submetering represents a new paradigm of energy conservation
in which the time that electricity is used is more important
than how much power is actually consumed. According to a time-sensitive
pricing approach, when power is in short supply, costs are
higher, thus discouraging excessive use. At 2:00 AM when supply
is plentiful, costs are lower.
Residential buildings may now participate in this pricing
system by purchasing power from Con Edison based on an hourly
cost. New York State’s PSC and ISO endorse this concept,
but RTP can only be operational if electric meters are programmed
to discern usage in short time intervals. The Coalition has
had numerous discussions with the ISO about offering incentives
to the residential community, as they do with the industrial
industry, to make installing time-sensitive submeters economically
attractive.
Certain commercial consumers are paid
not to consume electricity during a “curtailment event.”
The Coalition has demanded that these incentives be made available
to the residential community. How is this accomplished? By
installing “curtailment devices” to particular
electrical equipment, such as window air-conditioners. These
devices automatically turn the equipment off during a “curtailment
event,” thus reducing the peak load of electricity,
the demand is decreased and the risk of blackouts is diminished.
The benefits of being in this program
are two-fold. One, you’re a good citizen for reducing
the amount of electricity you use during peak hours and two,
you get paid for not using precious power. These devices are
consumer-friendly and easy to use. They may be manually overridden
if the consumer does not want the equipment turned off and
chooses to pay the higher electrical cost at that particular
time.
The Coalition is calling for the creation
of a balanced approach to electric affordability and reliability
in the residential sector. In addition to new power plants,
the Coalition advocates the implementation of a demand side
strategy that incorporates real time pricing and load curtailment,
which is the flip side of the “demand” coin. Curtailment
refers to the targeted conservation of electricity when supplies
are scarce and blackouts are imminent.
New York State has entrusted the ISO to call “curtailment
events” when a capacity emergency threatens such as
the event we experienced on August 14. Today’s technologies
enable users to automatically shut off electric-intensive
equipment such as window air-conditioners or building wide
public space air-conditioners. Customers that register with
the ISO to allow automatic curtailment during these critical
times are paid by the ISO for their capacity to conserve when
blackouts are forecast. We hope to create a multifamily curtailment
infrastructure that is capable of responding to capacity and
distribution power emergencies. In order to accomplish this
the building must have advanced (interval) meters that read
electric consumption in fifteen-minute cycles. The Coalition
is currently seeking J-51 tax abatement eligibility to promote
the implementation of this load-controlling equipment. This
would help empower residential consumers to impact the cost
and supply of electricity directly, as a supplement to broad
government and industry actions. J-51 eligibility would support
the installation of equipment and the ISO would follow with
financial incentives to participate in curtailment programs.
By supporting this measure, the City Council would clearly
articulate its faith in consumers and consumer-oriented load
curtailment.
The residual benefits will extend far
beyond cutting usage and saving money, it just might prevent
future blackouts. In the very near future Federation member
Fairview Owners Corp, a cooperative in Forest Hills, Queens
and a number of buildings in Manhattan will be among the first
buildings to implement RTP electric service and test automatic
load curtailment devices.
We have every reason to believe the
program will be successful and realize cost and energy savings.
If you are interested in more information on this subject
or wish to investigate the installation of interval meters
and introducing RTP in your cooperative you may contact the
Coalition at 718-760-7540.
AT PRESS
TIME: New York City Council Member Gail Brewer has
introduced legislation, Intro 524-03, in regards to dealing
with the misconception and misinterpretation regarding J-51
tax benefits for Mitchell-Lama buildings.
The Department of Housing Preservation
and Development (HPD) currently denies Mitchell-Lama developments
to claim J-51 benefits for energy conservation equipment (sub-meters)
if the development receives a subsidy from the New York State
Energy Research and Development Agency (NYSERDA). Under present
law, if a Mitchell-Lama receives any government subsidy they
are not entitled to J-51 benefits (no double dipping).
HPD has interpreted the law to mean
that any subsidy from NYSERDA is a government subsidy. The
problem with this interpretation is that they are wrong! NYSERDA
is funded by consumer dollars, from what is called the System
Benefits Charge (SBC) on our electricity bills. It is not
tax revenues that NYSERDA grants, but rather electrical consumer
money.
Intro 524-03 provides that load curtailment
devices may be considered for J-51 tax abatements for all
buildings, including Mitchell-Lamas.
- top
-
FROM
THE PRESIDENTS DESK
By Albert F. Pennis
The
Federation of New York Housing Cooperatives and Condominiums
has been working diligently through the long, hot summer on
your behalf. In this issue you will find a wealth of information
on sub-metering, Real Time Pricing and possible J-51 tax benefits
for Mitchell-Lama buildings that choose to install interval
meters. There is also an extensive article on the August 14th
blackout and how members of the Federation have been monitoring
the power situation in New York and the Northeast and have
warned the State agencies that such an event was imminent.
In addition, you will find an article
on the recent decision of the United States Postal Service
as to their proposed mailbox requirements for new construction
and retrofitting of existing equipment. The Federation was
instrumental in exerting pressure on the federal agency convincing
them that mandating existing buildings to renovate their mailbox
areas could prove to be unduly expensive, and in some cases,
nearly impossible.
We are pleased to announce the formation
of the Federation Safety Group, offering workers’ compensation
insurance coverage at a discount through the Durnan Group.
The Federation is confident you will save money and enjoy
a high level of service. Please review the article and contact
our representative at the number listed.
Many of our members have written and called about difficulties
in obtaining liability coverage, terrorism insurance and other
forms of business insurance. On Thursday, September 25, the
Federation will co-sponsor a seminar on risk management with
RMI Consulting, the largest, independent risk management consulting
firm in the United States. The program will take place at
the LaGuardia Marriott, 120-05 Ditmars Boulevard, Queens at
8:30 AM. Admission is free and continental breakfast will
be served.
In addition to all these activities,
the Federation is constantly monitoring federal, state and
city legislation as it affects the cooperative and condominium
community. We are persistent in delivering the concerns and
needs of our membership to the proper administrative doorstep.
In keeping with that theme, on September
10 through 14, 2003 I attended, along with the Federation’s
Executive Director Greg
Carlson and Board Member David Buchwalter, the National Association
of Housing Cooperatives’ (NAHC) annual convention in
Atlanta, Georgia.
For 50 years the Federation has provided
education and information to our community. Now we ask for
your support.
As our numbers increase, so will our
influence. We need your membership dollars to help support
our programs, this newsletter and our administrative office.
We need your participation at seminars, industry events and
social functions to further the cause of cooperative living.
If you are not a member, please take
the time to complete the application on page two. If your
membership has recently lapsed, please do the same and confirm
your commitment to the cooperative movement.
- top
-
POSTAL
SERVICE TO EASE MAILBOX RETROFIT REQUIREMENTS
At the urging of the Federation of New
York Housing Cooperatives and Condominiums and other local
and national organizations, the United States Postal Service
(USPS) has temporarily agreed to drop its proposed rules requiring
apartment owners, in existing buildings, to retrofit USPS
mailboxes corresponding to the larger size specifications
for new construction.
However, the USPS is reserving the right
to apply retrofit requirements to current equipment, if and
when existing mailboxes are replaced due to normal wear and
tear.
The USPS determined it needed to devise
new specifications for apartment mailboxes due to consumer
complaints about identity theft and damaged mail due to small,
cramped mailboxes.
Additionally, the USPS claims that parcel
service has increased and mail carriers are suffering injuries
from sharp mailbox parts.
It is expected the new specifications will be finalized later
this year or early next year and will include the provision
requiring all new multifamily residences install mailboxes
that meet these new specs and parcel lockers for packages.
It should be noted, the USPS is considering
issuing waivers for retrofitted mailboxes. Those exemptions
tentatively include: inappropriate space to accommodate larger
boxes; shareholders and/or unit owners vote against replacing
current equipment with larger boxes and the costs associated
with retrofitting are prohibitive.
The proposed specs required for all new apartment buildings
are:
Mailboxes
Minimum dimensions: 3” h x 12” w x 15” d
Parcel
Lockers (minimum number to be based on the total amount
of building units)
Minimum dimensions (small):
15” h x 12” w x 15” d
Minimum dimensions (large):
18” h x 12” w x 15”d
The new specifications will include
stricter construction and higher-grade material requirements
to help reduce criminal tampering and deterioration due to
inclement weather.
The Federation applauds the USPS on
realizing the hardship their proposed regulations would have
on the cooperative and condominium community if existing building’s
were required to renovate their mailbox areas. The expense
and disturbance would affect all. But for some buildings,
there is no room to expand thus making the cost, on already
stretched to the limit budgets, unbearable.
- top
-
ENERGY
AND J-51 BENEFITS FOR MITCHELL-LAMA DEVELOPMENTS
Energy Investment Systems (EIS), a specialist
in energy surveys and J-51 benefits, is investigating ways
to increase incentives for Mitchell-Lama buildings that take
advantage of New York State conservation programs, such as
submetering rebates with the Energy $mart Loan Fund.
Currently, improvements in Mitchell-Lama
developments receiving any financial assistance from the New
York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA)
are ineligible to receive J-51 real estate tax abatements.
EIS is working with the Federation and the Mitchell-Lama Council
to liberalize these restrictions. The objectives of this effort
are:
1) To permit J-51 tax abatements
for Mitchell-Lamas using System Benefits Charge funds
to support submetering and conservation;
2) To expand J-51 benefits for
advanced meters and load control technologies;
3) To reduce electricity costs
to Mitchell-Lama building residents;
4) To enhance electricity reliability
and affordability in New York City. |
EIS research has identified numerous
policy reasons to support the overall objectives. It has also
concluded that the J-51 regulation does not apply to NYSERDA
projects financed with electric ratepayer funds. This is evidenced
by:
1) City Council minutes, referring to
the J-51 Mitchell-Lama limitation, state that the new 1988
provision would permit J-51 benefits to Mitchell-Lamas as
long as “the work is not governmentally assisted.”
The J-51 regulatory term “substantial government assistance”
refers to City funding programs and City and State mortgage
insurance.
2) The NYS Public Service Commission
selected NYSERDA as the third party administrator of SBC funded
programs. PSC orders, and a recent letter to EIS president
Lewis Kwit, documents that these SBC funds are part of electric
service - from and for the ratepayers - and is therefore not
part of government funds.
The Cooperative Coalition to Prevent
Blackouts (CCPB), founded by Jordi Reyes-Montblanc, president
of the HDFC Council, Greg Carlson, executive director of the
Federation of New York Housing Cooperatives and Condominiums,
Peter Funk, former president of the board of 322 Central Park
West Corp and Donald West, director of Seward Park Houses,
urges the City Council to pass legislation which removes this
impediment to Mitchell-Lama buildings’ eligibility of
J-51 benefits for improvements which receive SBC funded incentives
and help stave off power emergencies. The CCPB also requests
the Council develop separate legislation to make load control
equipment and systems qualify for J-51 tax abatements for
all eligible properties.
Executive director Greg Carlson of the
Federation said, “We cannot induce Mitchell-Lamas to
help meet the city’s energy problems if we limit their
incentives far below what other buildings receive.”
If you would like more information on
this project, a copy of the position paper or a way to lend
your support, contact EIS senior vice-president Jack Woolams
at lmk@eisincorp.com or call (212) 966-6641.
- top
-
NEW
MEMBER BENEFIT SAVE $$$ ON WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE
Continuing the tradition of offering
value-added services and programs to our members, the Federation
of New York Housing Cooperatives and Condominiums has selected
the Durnan Workers’ Compensation Safety Group to administer
the Federation Safety Group for workers’ compensation
insurance coverage.
Durnan developed this program specifically
for building owners and managers. Purchasing coverage through
the Federation Safety Group can save members over 60% on their
workers’ compensation insurance premiums.
Currently Durnan handles the workers’
compensation needs of more than 5,000 New York properties
and is the only real estate safety group in New York City.
“We’re ‘hands-on’
safety group managers,” says Christopher Durnan, president
of the company. “We pride ourselves on handling our
own claims with our in-house staff.”
All building owners and managers that
have employees are required by New York State to carry workers’
compensation coverage. The insurance covers on the job injuries
and occupational illnesses. While the basic published manual
rate for New York State workers’ compensation is the
same throughout the state, the Federation Safety Group initially
discounts that rate by a full 25%.
Each year, depending on the claims experience
of all the safety group members, additional savings can be
generated and a dividend check will be issued directly to
each Federation Safety Group member. The five-year dividend
average, experienced by similar safety groups in the program,
averages 33.5%.
This year alone, Federation members
have had to deal with an 18.5% increase in real estate taxes
and escalated fuel and liability premium costs. The Federation
Safety Group will decrease our members’ insurance costs
and save money, favorably impacting the bottom line on their
budgets.
“We are convinced the Federation
Safety Group can save our members money and deliver quality
workers’ compensation insurance service,” says
Greg Carlson, the Federation’s executive director. “I
urge all our members to call and compare their current premiums
to our program, I am sure they will be pleasantly surprised.”
To determine your potential savings
call Durnan’s representative Herbert Warshavsky at 212-768-9191.
- top
-
COOPERATIVE
APARTMENT ELECTRIC DEMAND REDUCTION AND ADVANCED METERING
BY PETER FUNK AND THOMAS RIOZZI
Encouraged by regulations,policy decisions
and programs in New York providing incentives to manage electricity
usage, end users are turning to technology in order to conserve
energy and realize lower prices. We have entered the era of
the “smart meter” and may now enjoy its many benefits
along with the measure of added complexity that technology
advancement often imposes. New York State is actively encouraging
the use of advanced meters, other load management devices
and participation in load management programs. Among the significant
aspects of smart metering is that it enables end users to
take advantage of timing differences in the market price of
electricity.
Commercial and Industrial Voluntary
Demand Curtailment
Recognizing that New Yorkers face persisting
tension between increasing demand for electricity and tight
supply, the New York Independent System Operator (NYISO),
with the approval of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC), is encouraging users to voluntarily curtail demand
in response to NYISO’s signals during periods of high
demand. Programs such as NYISO’s Emergency Demand Response
Programs (EDRPs), which make payments available to end users
for curtailing usage at times of peak demand, are viewed by
the NYISO as essential to the proper functioning of electricity
markets with respect to reliability and price. The EDRPs are
open to customers ranging from light commercial to heavy industry
and the wide variety of participants has ranged from cement
factories to cheese producers.
Options under the EDRPs generally
include: (i) voluntary load reduction measured against
a statistically set load baseline, (ii) competition
within a day-ahead bidding program under which participants
offer their load reduction into the market and compete
against generator offers and (iii) contractual commitments
to either reduce load or supply it by on-site generation.
The New York State Public Service
Commission (PSC) has supported demand response programs
and has encouraged their operation by requiring utilities
to establish appropriate tariffs, including Real Time
Pricing (RTP) rate structures based upon the NYISO’s
day-ahead market, for those customers who elect to purchase
energy in this manner. The PSC issued an order to extend
the effectiveness of these tariffs beyond their initial
termination date of December 31, 2002 to October 31,
2005 to correspond to a NYISO request to FERC for a
similar extension of NYISO’s EDRPs. |
Metering
On the regulatory side, PSC proceedings
over a period of years directed towards opening areas of utility
service to competition have included policy decisions with
respect to metering. PSC policy now calls for installing,
testing and reading meters along with data handling to be
opened to competitive providers, including the incumbent utilities.
This policy also allows for meter ownership by competitive
providers, utilities and non-residential end users meeting
specified demand criteria. The PSC is currently considering
implementation details for these new metering policies. The
PSC has also encouraged electric distribution utilities to
facilitate efforts by customers to utilize advanced, remote
metering.
On the incentive side, the New York
State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA)
is encouraging the installation of advanced meters and other
energy management devices by commercial, industrial and institutional
customers to permanently reduce load or enable them to participate
in the NYISO’s demand response programs. For example,
a current NYSERDA Program Opportunity Notice (PON) provides
incentives for the installation of interval meters by customers
participating in NYISO load reduction programs, transmission
owner load response programs or such programs offered by load
serving entities (LSEs). Another example is that NYSERDA will
provide incentives for the installation costs related to advanced
interval meters and other elements of energy management systems
for multi-family residential apartment buildings.
Real Time or Other Time Sensitive
Pricing
Advanced interval meters are necessary
in order to take full advantage of purchasing electric energy
on a time sensitive basis. Time of use (TOU) pricing has a
long history but has not been generally available in bilateral
contracts following deregulation. Widespread time sensitive
pricing is essential in order to provide incentives to end
users to manage demand. The NYISO advocates “connecting”
wholesale and retail markets. Doing so will create time sensitive
rate structures for a wide range of consumers and encourage
non-residential and residential load management.
- top
-
Real
Time Price Tariffs for Purchasing Power
Notwithstanding NYISO encouragement,
it can be difficult to find suppliers offering time sensitive
rates. An alternative, however, is to purchase power under
a Real Time Price tariff. For example, Con Edison’s
voluntary real-time pricing tariff (RTP rate) is applicable
to several service classifications such as commercial, industrial
and multi-family dwellings. Although the demand rate under
that tariff can be higher than Con Edison’s Retail Access
demand rate (since the RTP rate is under Con Edison’s
full service tariff) there remain significant potential savings
to those end-users able to move usage to off-peak periods.
Prior to taking service under any RTP rate, end-users should
analyze their specific demand curves in order to determine
whether there is sufficient elasticity of demand to justify
purchasing at the RTP rate. The installation of advanced interval
meters is key to any comprehensive analysis of a facility’s
usage patterns. While Con Edison and other utilities can provide
standardized load curves, only an interval meter will enable
an end-user to determine its own usage characteristics sufficiently
to conduct a meaningful analysis.
There are several potential benefits
to load management - reduced demand charges, receiving curtailment
payments and lower energy costs. A variety of end-users have
and can benefit from load management. Non-residential customers
such as commercial users, hospitals and school districts have
installed advanced interval metering and building management
systems (BMS) that serve diverse functions.
For example, school districts have made
such installations as a portion of projects that involved
the installation of energy conservation measures and cogeneration.
The installation of a BMS affords the facility essential knowledge
and control of energy usage. Apartment buildings that have
submetered under PSC regulations, by installing a master meter
and individual apartment meters can also benefit from advanced
metering and load management.
There are several projects in New York City cooperative apartment
buildings designed to demonstrate the benefits of programs
centered around advanced metering, curtailment and time-sensitive
rates. One of those projects is taking place in the cooperative
apartment building in which Peter Funk, one of the authors
of this article, resides. The lessons learned from these projects
should be broadly applicable to residential and non-residential
electricity end-users. Energy Investment Systems, Inc. (EIS),
whose president is Lewis Kwit, is implementing a model in
these buildings that EIS developed based upon information
derived from several years of participation in NYSERDA supported
programs.
One of EIS’ projects includes:
(i) advanced interval meters and equipment which can measure
usage in time intervals and can read meters automatically;
(ii) telephonic interconnects with Con Edison; (iii) automatic
curtailment control devices (with overrides to meet resident
approval); (iv) individual apartment display devices which
provide energy-related information; (v) the purchase of electric
power at the RTP rate or other time sensitive arrangement
and (vi) the development of an internal time sensitive apartment
rate schedule which mirrors the RTP pricing categories and
considers peak demand periods. Apart from the master interval
meters to be installed by Con Edison, EIS has arranged for
Comverge Technologies, Inc. to provide the advanced meters
and other electronic units for that project.
The implementation of a rate structure within any building
having multiple users, whether commercial or residential,
raises challenges. These challenges can have technological,
practical and regulatory aspects. In particular, consideration
must be given to state and local regulations relating to the
sale of electricity. For example, the apartment building project
referenced above is planning to switch to RTP rates and to
implement an internal rate structure to reflect RTP rates.
Gulf Power Company will be creating the building’s internal
rates. In establishing an internal rate the building will
have to consider the application of the PSC’s submetering
regulation that requires the cooperative to devise a cap on
internal rates in order to prevent bills to submetered residents
from exceeding the amount that would be charged for the same
kWh usage based upon a utility's residential tariff rate for
direct-metered utility service (SC-1).
Efforts by the PSC to establish a competitive
market for electric supply have required the unbundling of
the supply and delivery service portions of utility rates.
While precise unbundling has not yet occurred, interim back
out credits are in place. These deregulation steps occurred
after the promulgation of the PSC’s submetering regulations
and a certain dissonance has resulted.
There should not be a meaningful conflict
with the submetering rate cap since the average rate for each
submetered unit over time is expected to be significantly
below the SC-1 rate. However, rates during certain limited
hours of the day within summer peak periods, knowledge of
which is a benefit of interval metering, might be higher than
the SC-1 rate. Presently, a master metered building may elect
to purchase power from an alternative service provider for
fixed energy cost pursuant to a bilateral contract. Such a
contract could prove more expensive than direct utility service
for a summer month although, on average, be significantly
less than direct metered service. In the event the building
is submetered, such billing might not be in conformance with
the PSC’s submetering requirements, depending upon how
these are interpreted.
Further, complicating a comparison of
SC-1 and submetered rates are month-to-month changes in the
cost of direct-metered service and the demand component of
the SC-8 rate. The challenges are acceptable, however, because
using a uniform internal rate does not provide incentives
to residents to manage their demand and usage. For these reasons,
it is important to amend the submetering regulation in order
to accommodate and facilitate the advent of RTP in the multifamily
sector.
There are also challenges raised by
implementing an advanced submetering system within New York
City. New York City requirements relating to the compliance
of socket-variety advanced submeters of the Bureau of Electrical
Controls within the New York City Buildings Department (DOB)
exist side-by-side with PSC regulations governing utility
meters but not always harmoniously. With end-users and their
contractors installing an increasing number of meters and
in light of the PSC’s policy decisions that will serve
to increase the number on non-utility owned and installed
meters, it is critical for the DOB to have a meter approval
system in place that is in alignment with statewide policies
and initiatives. One of the lessons we have learned from these
projects is that the assimilation of RTP into conventional
consumer society will require governmental action at all levels.
In summary, implementing advanced metering, RTP rate purchasing
and, where applicable, establishing an internal time-sensitive
price structure can be a cost effective way to manage electricity
and save money. The ability to participate in NYISO curtailment
incentives and load shedding will create value-added benefits.
Of course, educating end-users about automatic curtailment,
RTP rates, ISO curtailment incentives and related opportunities
is critical. We believe that the combination of institution
incentives, time sensitive tariffs and advanced metering and
curtailment technologies can provide important benefits to
end users, the city in which they live and advance statewide
energy reliability initiatives.
Peter Funk (peter.funk@thompsonhine.com)
and Thomas Riozzi (thomas.riozzi@thompsonhine.com) are attorneys
in the law firm Thompson Hine LLP, New York City, 212-344-5680.
- top
-
COOPER
SQUARE PARTNERS WITH FIRST SERVICE
Cooper Square Realty, Inc. announced
it is partnering with FirstService Corporation to create one
of the most comprehensive residential property management
companies in New York. The company’s services include
property management, real estate sales and leasing, mortgage
brokerage and construction project management for its portfolio
of properties with an aggregate asset value exceeding $2.5
billion.
Recognized as one of New York’s
most prestigious full service real estate firms, Cooper Square
has received numerous industry awards over the years for its
leadership, professionalism and innovation in the property
management industry. Most recently, it was honored with the
Federation’s “Management Company of the Year”
award.
David Kuperberg, president and principal
shareholder of Cooper Square Realty, was attracted to FirstService
as a result of their share values and business philosophies
including their common desire to provide their customers with
the highest levels of service in the industry. Kuperberg commented,
“The alliance of the two companies establishes a clear
vision, to provide our clients and employees the personal
attention associated with a leading regional player while
at the same time, providing them with the benefits of a larger
organization.”
FirstService is the North American leader
in the residential property management industry, managing
over 2,000 properties totaling more than 400,000 residential
units from 36 offices in 14 states. Jay Hennick, president
and Chief Executive Officer said, “Cooper Square has
a tremendous reputation in Manhattan and joining the two operations
will create the dynamic necessary to take Cooper Square to
the next level.”
The partnership allows Cooper Square
the ability to offer 21st century technologies and practices
in property management services.David Kuperberg further commented,
“The partnership also brings our clients exclusive proprietary
technology to modernize the way we conduct our business. For
example, we will be able to instantly communicate with all
our residents at once - at the exact moment - this is just
one of the programs we will be rolling out in the near future.”
Cooper Square is also in the process
of constructing a new state-of-the-art training center, in
the company’s main office. The training center will
combine the latest technology with hands-on learning for all
management and building service employees making them the
most knowledgeable professionals in the industry. Training
programs will include heating and air conditioning, plumbing,
elevator, security, concierge and a variety of other services
necessary to properly operate and maintain our client properties.
Kuperberg concluded, “Cooper Square’s
greatest asset has always been our employees and it is important
that we continue to introduce enhanced programs to ensure
their commitment to excellence. With the support and resources
now available to us through this new partnership with FirstService,
I am proud to lead this company into the next generation of
property management.”
- top
-
FEDERATION
PRESENTS RISK MANAGEMENT SEMINAR THURS, SEPT 25, 2003
The Federation of New York Housing Cooperatives
and Condominiums is co-sponsoring a seminar on insurance risk
management on Thursday, September 25, 2003 at the LaGuardia
Marriott, 120-05 Ditmars Boulevard, East Elmhurst, Queens,
at 8:30 AM with RMI Consulting, the largest, independent risk
management consulting firm in the United States.
Risk management, insurance and employee
benefits consultants do not sell insurance, but rather provide
expertise by reviewing policies to make sure that the client
(businesses, buildings, developments, etc.) is taking full
advantage of every benefit the insurance marketplace can offer.
The current insurance climate is extremely
volatile with insursance companies dropping long term customers,
decreasing coverage, increasing premiums and, in many cases,
leaving the insurance business altogether. Real estate industry
professionals claim that insurance premiums have been the
most unpredictable and expensive item in their budgets for
the last two years.
The Federation has teamed up with RMI
to present this forum so that management companies, boards
of directors and businesses can arm themselves with the latest
information to help reduce their exposure to loss, adequately
protect themselves against risk and possibly reduce their
premiums in the process.
The seminar is free to Federation members
and the general public. It is recommended in order to receive
the full benefit from this program attendees review their
insurance policies in advance, taking note of how much coverage
they have, what the premium is and when the policy expires.
Continental breakfast will be served. Reservations are requested.
Please call Jim Quinn at Q Financial Services, 718-423-1527.
- top
-
|